Have chicken first or have an egg first, it is classical controversy topical, take out again here be the same as with everybody happy.

Have chicken first

If the first egg exists on the world, have surely yield the chicken of this egg, otherwise this egg have no way goes out, be with chicken exist at the egg first, there must be ＠ of gallinaceous ＠ ＠ first on conclusion world from this

Have an egg first

If the first chicken exists on the world, have hatch surely the egg of this chicken, otherwise this chicken have no way goes out, be with the egg exist at chicken first, there must be ○ of egg ○ ○ first on conclusion world from this


These two conclusion are right, can contradict again, how to return a responsibility?
Actually here is an author intended and promiscuous the concept of both.
Above all, to " chicken " the concept, can yield the animal of the egg cries " chicken " , does the animal that still is egg hatch cry " chicken " ? The concept makes clear first surely.
Next, to " egg " the concept, can the thing of hatch chicken cries " egg " , be still the thing that chicken yields cries " egg " ? The concept also makes clear surely.
If the concept was made clear, argument also not argue is axiomatic. Do not know you to think to be denied like that?