The apologetic skill of capital punishment case
From;    Author:Stand originally
Capital punishment case is different from general case, the apologetic life that mattered to party successfully directly whether can be able to keep, ought to take the kind that is different from general plead to the plead of capital punishment case so. Usually, capital punishment case should be apologetic premise with can preserving the life of party above all, and cannot seek result of front courtyard careful one-sidedly, speak with fervor and assurance on the court, eloquent, win universal applause, but the party after the court decision is executed, the family member is very dissatisfactory, such circumstance common occurance, an outstanding plead should not do this.
The plead of capital punishment case does not have fixed pattern, want to define different defensive plan according to particular case, but below a few respects want to consider commonly:
(1) the natural condition of the accused person (grown, whether the woman is pregnant or is abortive case during detain) ;
(2) the evidence that accuses the accused person makes crime is legal, the associated sex with this case how;
(3) investigate, examine sue those who reach adjudgement level all sorts of law procedures and litigant writ whether lawful, all ready;
(4) technical the origin of appraisal material, whether does appraiser possess appraisal qualification, appraisal conclusion and argument are equitable;
(5) the effect that whether the affidavit of the accused person suffers external condition, true;
(6) inquisition by torture extorts a confession, the circumstance of induce a person to make a confession exists;
(7) the time that the accused person is committed a crime by accusation, place, motive, purpose, method, consequence whether to accord with logic, have between each evidence without conflict;
(8) the accused person has without confess one's crime, mix candidly the circumstance of make contributions;
(9) whether accessary criminal, be an accomplice under duress makes person of the accused in collective crime;
(10) the quality that whether the behavior of the accused person forms self-defence or defense is become too or has defence;
(11) whether is the injured party put in fault or error;
(12) whether did accessary and civil compensation reach an agreement partly, if do not have, whether is analyse of part of one's job put in intercessory likelihood;
(13) inadequate to evidence, whether to exist accuse argue reconciles with the likelihood;
(14) the indictment is in law is applicable go up to whether be put in the problem;
(15) have deny " need not execute instantly " clue, put forward to the court " capital punishment postpone a deadline is carried out 2 years " proposal.


上一篇:Applicable system studies contemporary capital punishment quite
下一篇:Standard of standard of capital punishment substance limits research
Disclaimer:The only purpose of the site is to deliver more information. This dose not mean that the site will agree with the views and be responsible for its authenticity.