Position:Home>Current News>
Zhao Li: The supreme court whether for Xu Ting case " the bestow favours outside
From;    Author:Stand originally


Guangzhou quadrangle is applicable criminal law the 63rd the 2nd regulation, to making thunderbolt steal financial orgnaization one case reduces punishment, sentence a set term of imprisonment 5 years. (" people court signs up for " will report on April 1) criminal law the 63rd be such regulations the 2nd: Although the criminal does not have what this code decides to reduce condemnatory clue, but the special situation according to the case, via approve of top people court, also can sentence penalty below in legal punishment. According to legal provision, applicable this clause needs via approve of top people court, can court of so top people use this provision to allow thunderbolt case sanction and " the bestow favours outside the law " ? The author thinks the answer is affirmative, but positive result also is improper, change character, the supreme court may use this clause to be the bestow favours outside the law that make thunderbolt, but this kind of practice is improper.

Above all, case of meeting approve Xu Ting is in the supreme court criminal law 63 what go up the 2nd times is applicable. Reason has 3, one of, according to the routine that our country criminal tries, have the case of major effect socially commonly, the judge is met before the court decision beforehand up ask for instructions of one class court, the case that make thunderbolt should also won't exceptional, and, had chased form ask for instructions to arrive likely the supreme court. Secondly, the supreme court has attention early to making thunderbolt proposal, have the tendency that sentences gently. Jiang Changxing of supreme court assistant dean expresses when accepting a reporter to interview at an early date, guangzhou makes thunderbolt case belong to malign take a money, conviction and measurement of penalty is should... in light of the situation that understands at present from me, first instance sentences life imprisonment apparently overweight. This is Xu Ting before the supreme court reporting for duty on the case, the supreme court has shown the voice that leakage comes to. Thirdly, attention of society of the case that make thunderbolt is spent very tall, and major voice thinks to sentence life imprisonment unreasonable, the supreme court in order to talk politics famed, won't ignore these sound.

Next, applicable criminal law the 63rd belong to the 2nd times " the bestow favours outside the law " . The law that we know to criminal law regards limitation as person freedom and even privative other life is normative, it is the most severe law standard, its execution is having rigorous program, the fair sex that criminal law carries out and just sex are deciding social stability, but the mechanical sex that sets to balance criminal law, our country stipulated when formulate criminal law via the supreme court approve can be under legal punishment again measurement of penalty, this produced criminal law 63 the 2nd. Will tell commonly, this clause applies to special situation only, wait like crime of political motion, diplomacy, and do not apply to average case, this also is the original intention that establishs this provision, tell from this angle, the case that make thunderbolt is applicable this clause is belonged to " the bestow favours outside the law " . This clause cannot be unlocked easily, be abused extremely easily by the judge otherwise, what cause favor case, concern case, public opinion case thereby is flush, perhaps become the sword of high power that the corrupt official does not die or sentences gently.
上一页12 下一页

Disclaimer:The only purpose of the site is to deliver more information. This dose not mean that the site will agree with the views and be responsible for its authenticity.