Position:Home>Current News>
Guangdong tall courtyard is adjudged with respect to final judgment of the case
From;    Author:Stand originally

In new Guangdong net on May 22 report (reporter Tang Guijiang) 22 days afternoon, guangdong saves High Court to have the “ that gets attention makes thunderbolt case ” undertake adjudging, reject appeal, maintain original judgement, this is the final judgment court decision of this case.

2 will make at 10 o'clock in the evening 6 years 00 on April 21, xu Ting comes to highway of yellow Bu of area of Guangzhou the Milky way the ATM of some bank takes money machine to take a money. As a result Xu Ting discovers, take out a RMB 1000 yuan hind, the bank is buckled a yuan only in card account; Xu Ting takes a paragraph to amount to 171 early or late subsequently, aggregate RMB seventeen bits 50 thousand yuan.

2 7 years 00 on April 24, make the work that thunderbolt resigns its are in Guangzhou, carry paragraph abscond. After a year, xu Ting is arrested in railway station of Shaanxi treasure chicken bring to justice. 2 7 years 00 on November 29, guangzhou quadrangle first instance sentences its life imprisonment with larceny.

After media of classics of the case that make thunderbolt reports, public opinion is aroused in Chinese society wide attention and controversy. 2 8 years 00 on January 14, guangdong saves tall courtyard with the fact heavy careful does not answer this case hair for Qing Dynasty.

2 8 years 00 on March 31, guangzhou town intermediate court of justice makes public sessional cognizance the 2nd times, sentence Xu Ting 5 years with larceny on the court set term of imprisonment, fine RMB 20 thousand yuan, and pay compensation for what one has unlawfully taken thirteen thousand eight hundred and twenty-six yuan seventeen when its take out from bank ATM machine, xu Ting refuses to obey mention appeal.



上一篇:Zhang Mingjie: Of the case that make thunderbolt conviction with measurement of
下一篇:Wang Zunfu: Xu Ting makes theft
Disclaimer:The only purpose of the site is to deliver more information. This dose not mean that the site will agree with the views and be responsible for its authenticity.